• Joe Strummer Is Dead. A new song in "honor" of politics.

I wrote this song awhile ago — maybe a year or two — but was motivated to finish it by the looming election. When you hear the song you will most certainly hear a Clash riff or two so I've credited the writing of the song to Joe Strummer, Mick Jones and me. The players are the usual (stellar!) suspects:

Vocals: Toby Germano

Harmoanandgroanies: Me

Guitars and Bass: Tim Young

Drums: Andy Korn

Engineering: Jaimeson Durr

Recorded at Hyde Street Studio C, San Francisco, CA

• Notes on Cerebellum Blues, Playlists One and Two: the talent question.

Welcome to my series of posts about how I got into music and songwriting and the events that ultimately led to the 2012 release of my first album. Here are the posts, so far:

1. a little bit of blood, lots of sweat, a few tears (the launch!)
2. what’s with the title?
3. beginnings
4. from high school to LA and back

If you read anything that strikes a chord please let me know in the comments section or via email. As always, thank you for reading.


Before I move on to the next phase of my music life, there’s a topic I have to address: talent. I could try to define talent, but why should I when Merriam Webster’s has done it so well:


4a : a special often athletic, creative, or artistic aptitude

Yup, I agree with that, to me talent is potential you’re born with that hard work can bring out and hone. I have talent for some things, but playing in time, locking into a groove, is not one of them.

Many, if not most, people I talk to about talent tell me it’s a myth (there’s even a book called The Talent Myth, read it, bored), that we can all be great at anything. Bull. Even after subjecting myself to the reality distortion field of the mighty Malcolm Gladwell by reading his book Outliers, I remain unconvinced. Gladwell’s 10,000-hours rule has become de facto fact but I don’t buy it, or I am the exception to his rule. Once upon a time I might have believed that if worked hard enough — and truly practiced with intent — I could become a really good guitar player. But then I went to G.I.T.

When I started at G.I.T. in mid 1985, I had been playing guitar for about seven years and despite much woodshedding remained a fatally flawed musician. No matter how hard I tried — and I tried goddamn hard — I still really struggled to play in time, forget grooving. But as I read about  G.I.T.’s curriculum, its instructors, its guest lecturers and took in the gushing quotes from satisfied G.I.T. students and considered the school’s location, which was in the heart of Hollywood and just down the road from Capitol Records, I concluded that G.I.T. held the answer to my rhythm woes.

The early days of G.I.T. were all about scales and learned them all: major, minor, lydian, mixolydian, dorian, whatever. G.I.T. also placed emphasis on shapes, which really helped me navigate the neck of the guitar with more fluidity and to understand why certain things worked and others did not. Most important, for me, G.I.T. believed in timing, as in in playing on the beat. I bought an electronic metronome and I practiced everything to it. I practiced for hours and when I wasn’t playing to the metronome I was recording to my drum machine. It all helped, I got better, but better is not good and because good takes talent.

When I finished G.I.T. I knew a lot more about the guitar than when I started and this extra knowledge has served me well ever since. I was also a better guitar player. In fact, I was so much better than when I had started, I was still thinking about a career in music and after school had ended and I was driving back up to the Bay Area, I was plotting the formation of a band. But you can convince yourself of almost anything when driving at night on I5 and drinking a few too many cokes to stay awake.


Be sure to visit the photo gallery! I'm adding stuff all the time.

 

• Jim Marshall, creator of the Marshall Stack, has passed.

Back in the ‘70s, when I first started playing guitar, there was only one amp I really wanted, a Marshall. Nothing else came close. Marshalls had the dry, tight, crispy crunch that made hard rock sound like hard rock and all I wanted to play was hard rock. Deep Purple, Led Zeppelin, UFO, Yesterday and Today, Judas Priest, Rainbow, Free, Bad Company, these were my favorite bands and they all used Marshalls. Word was, of course, that everyone modded their Marshall’s but I imagine that this was more hype than truth. I mean, plug a Les Paul into a Marshall and tell me you need to mod something.

One of my greatest memories is of being in my friend Chris Churchill’s garage with Chris and Rich Erickson and playing the chords to Smoke on the Water through Rich’s new Marshall Half Stack. Eventually I got my own Marshall. First I had a combo thing, can’t remember the model number, but it was supposed to be more versatile than the standard Marshall Super Lead. It was, but it was no Super Lead, which I got later on. What an amp, so loud, so cool looking, so Marshall.

I confess, I’ve never liked the look of the newer Marshalls as much as the classic Super Lead from the ‘70s. The problem is the logo. The older Marshall logo was small, but the new one is big and white and cheap looking. I’m sure the reason for the change to the logo was to make it more visible in venues, but Marshalls were visible, for chrissakes. They were distinctively designed with their angled cabinets, they were about six feet tall, they were unique. Besides, they were Marshalls and sounded like nothing else. They didn’t need a big, fat cheesy logo.

Today, I learned that Jim Marshall died. How is that possible? To me, Marshall was never a human being, but an amp. Truly, I never thought of the man behind the gear, didn’t even know there was a Jim Marshall for years. I know that sounds cold and I don’t mean it to, it’s just the truth. Now that he’s gone, I’m more aware of him than ever and will read up on his life, for he forever changed mine.

Long live Marshall.

• Ronnie Montrose: 1947 - 2012.

I still remember the rehearsal space. It was in the drummer’s basement and on days when we rehearsed, we made a fine noise. Or at least I think we did. It was my first band so I was hardly an expert. One of the songs we played was Rock Candy by Montrose. It starts with a monstrous drum beat and builds on a guitar riff so fat, it’s like Leslie West after a doughnut binge. I was a spoiled kid so I had a Les Paul and a Marshall, but my tone was nowhere near the record. And then there were all the fills, each so fluid and musical, and then the riff again. Maybe I mastered the basic riff, maybe, but all the nuances that make Rock Candy ROCK CANDY were missing. And that’s the magic of Ronnie Montrose’s guitar playing. At first it sounds simple, then you try to play it and you are flummoxed time and time again as he changes up the groove, works out double stops, holds a bend, times a release just so. What a talent. But let's not forget those riffs: Rock Candy, of course, but also Bad Motor Scooter, Rock the Nation, Make It Last, Space Station #5, even Paper Money. Oh, and how about Free Ride and Frankenstein? All parts of my youth and part of who I will always be. So when I read yesterday that Ronnie Montrose had died a bit of me died, too. He was one of the very first guitarists I got into and Rock Candy was a staple of more than one band I was in. Ronnie, may you rest always amidst a chorus of Les Pauls through cranked up Marshalls.

 

• Buddy Miller, one of the greatest harmony singers of all time.

I love harmony. Simon and Garfunkle, CSNY, The Eagles. All good, but none can hold a candle to The Beatles, the greatest harmony singers of all time, for all time, till the end of time. But up there with The Beatles I have to put Buddy Miller, a GREAT lead singer, one of the greatest in my book, and an equally great harmony singer. Buddy does the hard stuff, like Lennon, like Paul Simon (and you thought Art did the great harmony, right?). Because in harmony, what singers typically do is sing higher than the lead singer. You hear that all the time, ask someone to harmonize with you and they will look for notes above what you’re singing. But the most interesting notes — and the hardest to sing — are the ones below. Listen to Buddy Miller with Emmylou Harris and try to pick out his melody. No easy task. Now add his ability to follow her lead so effortlessly you’re barely aware that he’s doing it. Sure, they’ve rehearsed, but Emmylou is not going to sing a note-for-note version of her rehearsal performance. She’s going to follow her heart in the moment. And Buddy Miller does the same. I get chills every time I listen to these two sing this song. Hope you do, too.

• Is this one of the greatest combinations of song and cinema ever?

The other day I joined

Taxi

, a service that helps songwriters and bands get their music heard by the right people. That night, I got home and already Taxi was sending me emails about opportunities. One caught my eye. It asked for a haunting song for a film placement and at first I was excited but after reading a little further my excitement faded. No love songs implored the email. But still, I was curious, so I clicked on the link in the email to the kind of song being sought. I was expecting a treacly bit of piano puss, but instead I was taken to a commercial for a video game called Gears of War. I love video games so I clicked play. I was transported. Whoever did the art direction for Gears of War is a Talent, but equally inspired was the choice to combine Gears of War footage with a song called Mad World. It was a hit back in 1982 for Tears for Fears but I missed it because I hated bands like Tears for Fears (no guitars, no glory). The song was a hit again in 2001, when it was covered by Michael Andrews and Gary Jules and used in Donnie Darko but I missed that, too. No reason, really, just missed it. I missed it again when it was used to launch Gears of War in 2006. But the other night I did not miss it. I sat transfixed in front of my laptop, the song transcending the small, cheap tin box speakers playing it and the video doing the same for the ugly YouTube container that could not contain it. Again and again I hit Play. The next day I downloaded the song from Apple. Then I read about it on

Wikipedia

. Then I looked up the lyrics. Then I learned it on the guitar. Imagine that: the chords were Em, G, D, A for the verses and Em, A, for the choruses. So simple yet so much more. I went on a mad search for more videos, found the official one for the release of the Andrews/Jules version, checked out Tears for Fears’ version, then found the clip I’ve posted above. Maybe I’m mentally ill, it can’t be healthy to like something like this, but I do. So, is it one of the greatest combinations of song and cinema ever? For me, right now, yes.

Unreal (pun intended).

• Some thoughts on SOPA and PIPA.

This week saw a successful protest launched against SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect IP Act) and it now seems unlikely that either will pass. I suppose this is a good thing, as I believe that no law is better than a bad law, but...

I’m always stunned at the hostility shown toward content ownership. I suppose it’s a bit like the military, in that people are often against the institution but not against the soldiers. It’s a good technique as it dehumanizes the enemy (you direct your anger toward an organization vs the foot soldiers within it). But people seem willing to go a bit deeper in the content debate and call out individuals and call them greedy and evil. Why, just because some content creators would like to have the choice to protect what they’ve created?

In my opinion, copyright and patent laws are a good idea. Right now, copyright is a bit screwed up as owners can retain ownership for overly long (basically infinite) periods of time. I’d say cap it at 20 years and be done with it. Patents are already handled this way and the system seems to work well (look at all the innovation coming out of the US).

The problem lies with enforcement. How the hell do you define and allow a reasonable amount of sharing, while preventing wide-scale theft? I honestly don’t know, but the answer is not to place all the responsibility on publishers. Also, I don’t think you want a law that is smudgy; you want crystal clear rules that allow very, very little interpretation. Honestly, it seems like a job for some elegant code, but I guess no one either has or wants to write it.

As for all this “no flies on me” blather from the likes of Google and Facebook, it does not hold a lot of water for me. These companies want it both ways: they want to totally protect what they deem to be most valuable to them while promoting the idea that everything should be shared. Yes, Google pays royalties for YouTube, but you and I both know they’re getting a very, very good deal by not having to either pay ALL royalties due or police their service. Seriously, try to explain to a cop that you didn’t know you were speeding. Chances are he’ll just get mad. And what about the file lockers like Megaupload, recently shut down, that host illegal content but are never told No by Google when they want to sell ads?

Bottom line: something needs to be done. SOPA and PIPA were not good ideas for two reasons: 1) they did not seek to update copyright law and 2) their methods of enforcement would have made a lot of money for lawyers but not content holders. It’s a tough problem: how do you allow a reasonably free flow of information without ripping off the people who create the information? I don’t have the answer. But all those so-smart-they-glow-Googlers should be able to figure it out. Sadly, they’re too busy blowing all their money on unprofitable ego exercises (quick, name one Google product besides Adwords and its relations that make money).

Harumph.