• Is Van Halen's new song, Tattoo, RAWK or rock?

Van Halen - Tattoo from Van Halen on Vimeo.

I've been an avid subscriber of The Lefsetz Letter for awhile now and find most every post to be a treasure of wisdom, wit and utility. Bob Lefsetz is the outside insider, a man who deals with the very uppermost echelons of the music business but is not afraid to bite the hand that feeds (or, at least, that's how he protrays himself; personally, I believe his image). So when he recently wrote about Van Halen's newest single, Tattoo, I read the post with even more fervency than usual and then promptly clicked over to Spotify to hear it. Lefsetz described the song thusly:

"... it’s positively ALIVE! "

You can imagine how high my expectations were, especially when you add that fact that, in my opinion, without Roth Van Halen is not Van Halen and I am super stoked that he is back in his rightful place.

My first take on the track was that it was pretty good, much better than almost anything done with Hagar and in the video you can see the goofy fun of Roth in spades, his acknowledgement that this is all totally ridiculous and life at its best. Love that about Roth.

A few days later, Lefsetz posted again about the track, this time focusing on its sound quality and sound quality in general. He wrote: "... if you’re listening to "Tattoo" on fifty nine dollar speakers, or the ones that came free with your computer, YOUR OPINION DOESN’T COUNT!"

I had to write Bob a note (you can do that, very cool) about how I thought that great songs didn't need great playback quality, they stand on their own. I referenced Free, whose "Alright Now" snorted from AM radio with fire and abandon and positively screamed Hit. When I finally heard it on a good system, it was even better, but it didn't need thousands of dollars worth of gear to shine. No great song does.

Then I listened to the Halen's track again. This time I downloaded it (hi-rez AAC from iTunes, best available today for the song) and put on my studio quality AKG headphones and dropped the "needle". Ho hum, sure, the song sounded better but it's not better.

Don't get me wrong, I love the track now, really dig it, even though the chorus sounds like it was written by the likes of Kara Dioguardi (will have to wait until the record comes out to know for sure!), but it grew on me the way all songs have: it grew on me in my head via my own internal playback system, my fancy headphones had nothing to do with it.

And I believe that for all the best songs. They don't need thousands of dollars of gear, they just need two ears.

Oh, and to answer the headline of this post? It's rock. C'mon, compare it to Jaime's Crying... Okay, it's Rock.

• Why DIY is so great. And sucks, too.

Yesterday, I finally approved the final proofs of my CD art work. I feel good, but nervous, because the last time I did this, I received my 1000 CDs from OasisCD and they were so riddled with errors that I simply had to pony up for a do-over. This might be the only full CD I ever make and I want it to be the best it can be.

Why all the mistakes? Simple, because in the true spirit of today’s Do It Yourself music world, I did all the art direction myself and I am not an art director. I can fumble my way through InDesign and Photoshop, but to say I know these programs would be like saying George Bush knows English.

In fact, the more I think about DIY, the more I realize what a double edge sword it truly it is. Sure, anyone can now do everything, from writing songs to recording them to creating the art work to registering them to posting them to marketing them etc, but at what cost to their core art? Instead of staying up late trying to crack a verse, you’re fumbling around in Photoshop or struggling to grok a web site for posting your music to. Or maybe your computer has crashed and you’ve got to figure that out. Art? Who has the time anymore?

Anyway, despite my reservations, I would not trade today’s DIY world for the days of yore for anything. To go back to a time when just about every aspect of making a record meant being highly dependent — and in debt — to others would be like having to go back to a time before cell phones. I could survive, but would I want to?

And so I wait with crossed fingers, toes and eyes, and hope that when my CDs arrive this time they are perfect. And if they're not, I will simply have to consider any flaws as, um, charming.

• My entry in Mont Blanc’s “The Beauty of a Second” contest, to be judged by Wim Wenders (I hope!).

I’m not sure why Mont Blanc cares so much about the birth of the chronograph watch, but apparently it’s a big deal to them because they are holding a contest to celebrate its 190th birthday. Called The Beauty of a Second, the contest lets anyone submit a one second clip to be judged first by just about anybody and then, if it survives, to be judged by Wim Wenders. I’m no videographer, much less a film maker, so my clip is low on technical merit, but the content is true beauty to me: it’s Tim Young doing a take for a song that will appear on my next album.

• Is Avid a good investment today?

I recently bought an Avid MBox 3 Mini with Pro Tools 10 and posted about it. My post was mostly about whether new gear had ever really helped my abilities much, but a comment made by Chaco D about Avid’s aggressive and uncool upgrade pricing got me thinking Avid the company and what its fate might be. Being an amateur but seasoned by PAIN investor I checked Yahoo Finance to see what Avid stock was selling for these days. Last time I checked was in 2005 and the stock was at $60. I remember being mad because I had sold my shares well before the run-up got even close to $60, which turned out to be a peak. Today Avid stock sells for, drum roll -- please -- about $6. Given that the number one rule of investing is buy low, sell high, I had to ask myself, “Is Avid a buy?”

Yahoo Finance reveals that at today’s price you can pay roughly $6 for nearly $18 in revenue. Delve into the facts about Avid as a company and you’ll learn that it’s an industry leader with great market share and not one but two powerful brands (Avid and Digidesign). But dig a little deeper and you’ll see two big problems: very little cash and an inability to cover costs, meaning that the cash is dwindling. I’ve seen this movie before and it usually only ends badly, which is what I think the case will be for Avid.

The company’s video editing business is under siege from the likes of Final Cut and other low-cost options; the company’s audio editing business is under siege from the likes of Logic at the high-end and Garageband at the low and a slew of other products in between. The problem: in both video and audio Avid is a victim of the good enough syndrome, created, in part, by Intel’s relentless improvements in processors, which is allowing the Average Joe to put together a good-enough video/audio editing system for not much more than a decent PC.

So, what’s Avid doing about its plight? I have no idea what the company’s plan is for high-end video, but in audio it seems to be to squeeze loyal users for every possible penny, plus a few more, while offering little in return. I say this not only because of Avid’s offensively aggressive upgrade pricing and schedule, but also because of the fact that the biggest “innovation” in Pro Tools 9 and 10 is that they no longer require Avid/Digidesign hardware. Which brings me to Avid’s Achilles heal: the whole company is structured to sell hardware, yet hardware has become mostly a commodity. Unlike Apple, Avid has not done much at all in hardware that could be considered innovative, at least not at the low-end (compare Avid’s clunky MBox 3 series to Apogee’s Duet II). The software appears to be a different story, though, as Pro Tools has definitely gotten a lot better over the years. So, like countless computer companies of yore, Silicon Graphics being the best example, that saw their specialized hardware outclassed by Intel machines running whatever, Avid is also seeing its proprietary hardware business being ground to dust by competitors leveraging standards.

Going forward, Avid has two choices: 1) limit all hardware to those areas where Avid can bring real innovation (chips not being one of them!) or (2) file for Chapter 11 and come back as a software-only company. Choice one is never going to happen -- it’s a mindset thing -- leaving only choice two, which will mean that current shareholders will get wiped out. Wait, there is a third choice, which probably is actually decent and that’s that someone buys Avid. Rough guess, I’d say the company is worth $10, but of course that could crater if debt piles up. Oh, and one last choice is to buy now and sell at $10 or so should Avid spike because of current sales (which won’t last, I guarantee it).

Sad. Digidesign was a great company and has been a part of my musical life since just about 1994, right when Avid bought them. Hate to see Digi/Avid in such dire straits; then again, they have done nothing to earn my loyalty so, you know, I don’t fell that bad.

 

• Suffering a bout of G.A.S. and the delusional thinking it causes.

A few weeks ago, an email arrived in my inbox trumpeting great and glorious and limited-time savings on Pro Tools 10. I hemmed, I hawed, I bit. I rationalized my purchase by telling myself that Pro Tools is a program I absolutely depend on, and I was now two versions behind and surely this was unacceptable. I further rationalized my purchase by musing on how Pro Tools 10 would free me from being tied to Digidesign hardware. I also had a long discussion with myself about the unquestionable merits of the bundled software and of the small size of the new audio converter box. But most important, I fell into a reverie about how my creative abilities would no doubt benefit from new gear. Ha. I should know better. From my Fostex multitracker to my Tascam 38 to my Roland VS880 to my Digidesign Session 8 to my ADAT to my first MBox and my second MBox, I can honestly say that none of these things helped my creativity one little bit. In fact, I think that most of my purchases of recording gear have been kind of like a sugar rush: a huge high followed by a crashing low, as the realization sets in that I am still the same songwriter I was just before my purchase. And this is the curse of new gear. It promises to complete you, to transform you, to be the key you have been waiting for, but it’s not and never will be. No, to get better at something you almost never need a new much of anything, you just need to work harder. I will say this, though, about new gear: no matter what history makes painfully clear, I will always hope that this time will be different. And so, as I twist the knobs on my new MBox, stare into its blue light, and marvel at what it all can do, I feel the promise of the new, the promise of dreams unfulfilled, the promise, always broken, that this time something huge will happen.
P.S. - In case you're wondering what G.A.S. stands for it's Gear Acquisition Syndrome, a terrible disease among musicians.

 

• Recording the third song of my second album and Joe Strummer Is Dead.

Monday was a whirlwind. Had a four-hour session with drummer Andy Korn and bassist Sam Bevan and when it was all over, I wasn’t sure I’d gotten what I wanted but I sure knew I had fun. Per usual, Andy and I ran through the songs White Stripes style, just bass and drums, and per usual it felt great to play loud guitar with loud drums. Sigh, wish I could do that more often. The first song we did was Hope, which will be the third song on my second album, an EP I’ve mostly finished writing, and the second song was Joe Strummer Is Dead, which will be the B-side to my political rant single, Stop Wasting My Time. I know, I know, what the hell am I doing working on upcoming albums when my first isn’t even out yet? To answer fully would require a longer post, but essentially I’m getting as much stuff in the can as possible, so that when I return to full-time work (soon, I hope!) I will be able to still release music but not have to spend much time in the studio. Speaking of releasing music, I am now awaiting final proofs of my first album and will hit the go button to start manufacturing in about a week! Stay tuned.